Analysis Of Zimbardos The Perils Of Obedience - 1189 Words

Stanley Milgram, an American social psychologist, writes in his article â€Å"The Perils of Obedience† about an experiment he designed which forced participants to either obey the demands of an authority figure, in this case the experimenter, or to turn against obedience and refuse to proceed in the experiment (Milgram 78). He found from this experiment that a minority of the participants refused to obey orders by the experimenter; therefore, most of the participants followed the orders given by the experimenter knowing it would result in the learner’s pain (Milgram 80). Milgram believes his results did not prove that these participants were sadists or mass murderers; however, his results did prove that ordinary people simply obeying orders can†¦show more content†¦Traci Stein Ph.D., an integrationist at Psychology Today, writes in her article â€Å"Dealing with Everyday Sadists and Other ‘Dark Personalities’† that everyday sadists will neve r take responsibility for harming another person, and they may seek harm in others because they believe it will benefit them in some way (Stein). In this case it is perceived that Stein and Milgram would agree that those capable of sadistic, inhumane acts will react in those manners without taking responsibility like the teachers in the Milgram experiment. On the contrary, Zimbardo effectively writes in his article about how dehumanization is portrayed within the six -day experiment by both the guards and the prisoners because of the way they were treated by each other (Zimbardo 111). If true, then this is also true in everyday life when people are treated differently than they are used to and will react abnormally or inhuman for that moment. Dr. Metin BaÅŸoÄŸlu, Head of Section of Trauma Studies at Kings College London and the Istanbul Centre for Behavior Research and Therapy, writes in the article â€Å"Cruel and Inhuman Treatment Causes More Mental Damage Than Physical Tortu re† about his findings of people being held captive in hostile, humiliation, psychological manipulation situations which appear to cause more mental than physical damage to the peopleShow MoreRelatedComparative Analysis a Few Good Men Essay1591 Words   |  7 PagesComparative Analysis: A Few Good Men â€Å"You dont need a patch on your arm to have honor.† Lt. Daniel Kaffee, portrayed by Tom Cruise, says at the end of the movie to Lance Cpl. Dawson after the final ruling is read, stating PFC. Downy and Lance Cpl. Dawson are innocent but are dishonorably discharged from the military. A Few Good Men portrays the negative impact on military personally from strict obedience. Lt. Daniel Kaffee, along with Lt. Cdr. JoAnne Galloway and Lt. Sam Weinberg; played byRead MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 Pagesof systematic study. Identify the major behavioral science disciplines that contribute to OB. Demonstrate why few absolutes apply to OB. Identify the challenges and opportunities managers have in applying OB concepts. Compare the three levels of analysis in this book’s OB model. MyManagementLab Access a host of interactive learning aids to help strengthen your understanding of the chapter concepts at www.mymanagementlab.com cott Nicholson sits alone in his parents’ house in suburban Boston